Monday, January 14, 2008

Survival of the Fittest?

Liberals and other gun fearing wussies don't mind dead mall shoppers and school kids. They would rather trust the benevolence, speed and efficiency of the government to save people, as opposed to letting people fend for themselves.

And as for people who are determined to defend themselves, they want to disarm them with the brute force of government. Even by sending guys with guns over to disarm them.

Remember this classic?

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in, I would have done it." - Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif, discussing the 1994 "crime bill", one of the largest gun control bills of the last 30 years.
And of course, implied in that is, "turn them in, or else".

Liberals sneer at the thought that we are the product of the Creator, evidence notwithstanding.

So for the evolutionary gun-grabbers, I posit this:

From a Darwinian/evolutionary perspective, those with the most effective and proper tools for survival in a given situation are indeed more fit for survival (think fire, clothing, spears, etc).
So, trained gun-owners are higher on the evolutionary scale than unarmed GFW's, and nanny-staters are.

So c'mon kids!! Make an evolutionary leap, and get yourself a pistol, or an evil black rifle, or both!!!

Or you can just sit in your puddle of fictional primordial goop and wait for your masters to save you or slay you...